Which scenario best illustrates the prisoner's dilemma?

Prepare for the Rutgers Introduction to Microeconomics Test. Study with comprehensive multiple-choice questions and detailed explanations. Master key economic concepts and excel in your exam!

The scenario that best illustrates the prisoner's dilemma is one where both players cheat to maximize individual gain. In the classic prisoner's dilemma, the situation is structured such that two individuals can either choose to cooperate or betray (or "cheat" on) each other. The optimal outcome for both players arises when they cooperate, yet if both choose to cheat, they both end up worse off than if they had cooperated.

When both players opt to betray each other, even though it is in their long-term best interest to cooperate, this results in the scenario where both players suffer the consequences of their actions. This outcome emphasizes the conflict between individual self-interest and mutual benefit, which is the core of the prisoner's dilemma. Thus, the essence of the dilemma lies in the fact that while each player has an incentive to betray for higher immediate gains, cooperation would yield a better overall result for both, showcasing the tension and complexity found within strategic decision-making.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy